Enhancing Bulk Assignment Emails

Turning a low-trust notification system into a high-engagement product touchpoint.

Trainual’s bulk assignment emails were a critical touchpoint—but they weren’t working. Users ignored them, distrusted them, or felt overwhelmed by them. I led an effort to redesign the experience to improve clarity, trust, and engagement.

Overview

Role: Lead Product Designer

Scope: Bulk assignment email notifications

Goal: Increase engagement and product usage

Impact: Exceeded click-through goals by 30%, driving increased logins and training completion

The Situation

Bulk assignment emails were meant to drive users back into the product to complete training.

But in reality:

  • Users ignored or deleted them

  • Emails felt cluttered and inconsistent

  • Engagement and downstream activity were low

This created a gap between intended behavior (complete training) and actual behavior (disengagement).

The Problem

The issue wasn’t just visual—it was a breakdown in trust and usefulness.

1. Low Clarity

Users couldn’t easily tell:

  • What the email was about

  • Whether it referred to one task or many

2. Poor Readability & Accessibility

  • Small text

  • Hard-to-scan layouts

  • Inconsistent formatting

3. Notification Fatigue

  • Redundant emails

  • Too many similar messages

4. Mismatched Expectations

  • CTAs led to unexpected destinations

  • Emails didn’t provide enough value to justify the interruption

5. Loss of Trust

  • Inconsistent design made emails feel like spam

Why This Was Hard

  • Emails had to work across devices, themes, and email clients

  • Needed to balance visibility vs. notification fatigue

  • Required alignment between content, design, and product behavior

  • Success depended on both email interaction AND downstream product usage

Strategy

We aligned on a core hypothesis:

If bulk emails are clearer, more trustworthy, and more actionable, users will re-engage with training and complete assigned work.

This led to three priorities:

  • Improve clarity and usability

  • Rebuild trust through consistency

  • Reduce noise while increasing value

Hypothesis Framework and Testing:

We created two hypotheses to align on the expected impact of the design changes for our users and our business goals, helping us focus on key areas to test and make data-driven decisions.

  • By implementing [specific design changes], we believe [user behavior] will improve, addressing [identified problem]. We expect to see [measurable impact].

Key Decisions

1. Simplify and Clarify the Message

We redesigned emails to clearly communicate:

  • What action is required

  • How many items are assigned

  • Why it matters

Why: Users shouldn’t have to interpret the email

2. Reduce Redundant Notifications

We streamlined when and how emails were sent.

Why: More emails ≠ more engagement

Tradeoff: Fewer touchpoints, but higher quality

3. Align CTAs with User Expectations

We ensured every CTA led to the correct, expected destination.

Why: Broken expectations erode trust quickly

4. Design for Readability and Accessibility

We improved:

  • Typography

  • Layout hierarchy

  • Mobile responsiveness

  • Dark mode compatibility

Why: Emails need to be instantly scannable in any environment

5. Establish Visual Consistency

We aligned design patterns across all email touchpoints.

Why:
Consistency builds credibility and trust

How I Led the Work

  • Synthesized user feedback into clear problem areas

  • Defined hypotheses tied to business and user outcomes

  • Conducted competitive analysis to identify best practices

  • Led iterative design, testing, and refinement

  • Collaborated with cross-functional partners to ensure alignment

Rather than jumping to solutions, I focused on validating what would actually change user behavior.

Competitive Analysis

We examined best practices in product email design, studying:

  • Color schemes

  • Dark mode compatibility

  • Mobile responsiveness

  • Iconography

  • Tone of voice

  • Gamification techniques

Solution

The redesigned experience focused on:

  • Clear, scannable content hierarchy

  • Reduced cognitive load

  • More meaningful, actionable information

  • Consistent and trustworthy visual design

The result: emails that felt less like noise—and more like helpful prompts.

Outcomes

The redesign drove measurable improvements:

  • Exceeded click-through rate goals by 30%

  • Increased Trainual logins

  • Higher training completion rates

  • Improved engagement across both admins and general users

Most importantly:

  • Users trusted and acted on emails again

What This Enabled

  • Email as a reliable engagement channel, not just a notification

  • Stronger connection between communication and product usage

  • A foundation for future personalization and smarter notifications

What This Demonstrates

  • Improving product outcomes by fixing communication touchpoints

  • Designing for behavior change, not just visuals

  • Balancing user needs with business goals

  • Using iteration and testing to drive measurable impact

Final Takeaway

This wasn’t just an email redesign—it was a behavior change problem.

By improving clarity, trust, and relevance, we turned a low-performing notification system into a meaningful driver of engagement and product usage.

Previous
Previous

FireHydrant Runbooks

Next
Next

Designing Content at Scale